Issue [2] Open the Gates
Issue Editorial
Editorial by Issue II Editors: Bettina Malcomess and Pervaiz Khan
[…] is an online publication and peer reviewed platform for creative research realised in live, digital formats. For this second issue of […] the editors, Bettina Malcomess, Pervaiz Khan made an open call for creative work across a range of disciplines that responds to another call: open the gates. The digital editor, Tegan Bristow, has managed the overall realisation of the web design with the assistance of MA research candidates at the Wits School of Arts, Alana Blignaut and Andrea Hayes, alongside Riaan Pietersen an independent backend developer.
The theme, Open the Gates suggests an actual and metaphorical opening of new possibilities, new assemblages and relations within sites of knowledge production. The call asked for projects that re-imagine and re-think the manifestation of creative research within the framework of an online journal. Ellipses foregrounds questions of the creative act and the modes of representation and remediation necessary and possible in the spaces of contemporary knowledge production online. Tangential to this thematic are questions of how creative research is measured, conceived and produced within the academy. An opening of the institutional gates and the boundaries of disciplines opens possibilities for the emergence of new and multiple languages, forms and modes of presentation.
This second edition of […] has focused on the realisation of original creative research work within the digital platform, as well as the translation of existing work into digital formats. A number of proposals were received from a range of artistic and academic practitioners and researchers, from which a selection of 6 projects was made.
The editorial process has involved a sustained conversation across technical, theoretical and artistic languages in order to arrive at a unique structure for each project. For existing work, the digital realisation has meant much more than documentation of an existing piece (be it performative, narrative or archival work) but a thinking that embeds the project’s form within the multiple logics of the online platform. The projects span work engaging directly with the education system and the archive as forms of embodied knowledge. Other works explore the possibilities of digital affect and audience.
Sumeya Gasa, Shameelah Khan and Dylan Valley’s Songs At The Gates looks at the after effects of the 2015/16 protests on students. It is the beginnings of a polyphonic repository providing an online space for ongoing reflection. This project sits in conversation with Thuli Gamedze’s Rethinking Education as Conversation, a digital iteration of the artist and writer’s physical mind mapping works, now unfolding on a digital wall, to ask urgent questions about the decolonisation of the higher education system. Jurgen Meekel’s Palinopsia /After Image interrogates presence and absence through the appearance and gradual disappearance of death mask-like images. This along with other pieces bear out the particularity of digital epistemologies and ontologies within the twin conditions of permanence and ephemerality. Here, Felix Kawitzky and Marianne Thesen Law’s Portal: the letters presents an archive for a disappearance, somewhere between a fiction and research project, the work brings together several collaborators who playfully stage the points at which the language of research as ‘search’ break down. Jacaranda Time: Diagrams of Collaboration, a collaboration between Cameron Harris, Mwenya Kabwe, Sonja Radebe and Tegan Bristow, also reflects the complexities of the translation of a live performance project into an interactive online archive. Jonathan Kane’s 60+: Queer Old Joburg works with material from the Gay and Lesbian Archive to present a kind of digital derive in a daring non-linear format that collapses the timeline, the collection, the interview and the map.
Each of these projects search for a language with which to manifest creative research by practicing a mode of what Irit Rogof terms ’embodied criticality’: ‘a state of duality … from which one cannot exit or gain a critical distance … the point of criticality is not to find an answer but rather to access a different mode of inhabitation … ‘. Embodied Criticality is thus compared by Rogof to a form of smuggling, of being both inside and outside. As part of this continual questioning of the place and value of creative research within the academy […] has, with the permission of peer reviewers (some of whom have chosen to remain anonymous) published peer reviews alongside projects. The replies of makers to peer reviews will in some cases also be visible, making transparent the normally opaque workings of academic processes of the valuation of creative research.
Ellipses edition II speaks to the exciting potential to rethink disciplinary boundaries within the arts, but also between arts and sciences. It attempts to explore and cross the divide between the physical and material space of artistic, musical and performative practices, critical theory and digital dissemination.
Articles by
Cameron Harris
Articles by
Dylan Valley
Articles by
Felix Kawitzky
Articles by
Jonathan Cane
Articles by
Jurgen Meekel
Articles by
Marianne Thesen Law
Articles by
Mwenya B. Kabwe
Articles by
Shameelah Khan
Articles by
Sumeya Gasa
Articles by
Tegan Bristow
Articles by
Thulile Gamedze
Issue Editors
About
Alana Blignaut
About
Andrea Hayes
About
Mishka Naidoo
About
Tegan Bristow
About
Bettina Malcomess
About
Pervaiz Khan
60+: Queer, Old Joburg
A living archive of older queer residents in Joburg.
“Cruising as archiving; archiving as cruising.”
Abstract
This project is a collaborative design piece evolving out of the archival work from the ongoing Wits City Institute, GALA and SeaM: Security at the Margins (Wits/Edinburgh) project to document the life histories of older LGBTIQ residents of Joburg. The design piece is a collaboration between Jonathan Cane of the Wits City Institute and designers Mishka Naidoo and Andrea Hayes. We centre the ideas of marginality and queer people’s lives before the end of apartheid and are especially interested in older queer people who can present us with a kind of map, a living archive. How, for many of these queer people, did home and home making become constructed as a mode of safety, what objects and structures coded a place for articulating freedom? What parts of Johannesburg, which places, which intersections, which locations had meaning? By researching the spatial histories of aged LGBTIQ persons we hope to map the profound changes associated with decriminalisation, the end of apartheid and the ongoing struggle for safe spaces for queer flourishing.
The creation of a queer digital archive allows us to experiment with ‘cruising’ as an archival method, as digital practice and as process; exploring the use of the digital in order to collect, manage, process, analyse, share, protect, disseminate, store, access and organise. The proposal opens up a number of questions: How can a digital archival platform make material accessible to those who might not easily engage with and contribute to queer histories? What kinds of spatial representations and connections are made possible by web-based archiving? What is the generative capability for the digital arts in terms of building a queer archive? The first interview from this series is presented online here for Ellipses […]. It must be pointed out up front that as a single oral history of a Sunday morning drive through downtown Joburg it represents a particular journey through the city. That many queer people — mostqueer people — did not move around Joburg with such ease in the 70s and 80s — and still don’t — is a critical frame for the current project. Cruising has never been an equal mode of manoeuvre in the city or online.
Authors
Jonathan Cane
Digital Editor
Mishka Naidoo
Andrea Hayes
Peer Reviews
Peer Review
My initial experience of the 60+: Queer, Old Joburg interview profiled in Elipsis [..] was one of haltering negotiation, frustration even: how do I silence this disco clip, move this flashing banner, obstructing image, access the material? But of course, this is the material – this is memory work layered and imbricated within a criminalized, ‘peripheral’ history of queer experience, affirmation and self-expression. Navigating the interview becomes as much a work of reading as of looking and listening – of imaginatively reconstituting spaces and human encounters from fragmentary sketches and archival traces. And, as derived from individual oral accounts of historically marginalised and largely unscripted narratives, it is intimate relational work – recalling the kind of periphery-to-periphery movement associated with Edouard Glissant’s poetics of relation. In this sense, I find the intimately obstructive and experiential interface of the platform productive on a number of levels, as the erotics of affect, memory and imagination are drawn into an academic archival research project.
Problematic for me is that this first interview in a proposed series is presented in isolation rather than in relation to alternative even conflicting experiences, accounts and histories. As the introductory text admits, this is an account of privilege – assumedly white male privilege – in which the mobility and access of this particular narration of cruising would not necessarily have applied across lines of race, class and gender. Rather than initiating the project from this (to some extent discrediting) position, a more plural approach may have been more productive, in revealing the overlaps and contradictions of intersecting queer experiences in the context of apartheid. As the text explains: “Cruising has never been an equal mode of manoeuvre in the city or online”. In this vein, whilst anonymity can work productively (in resisting a sometimes problematic insistence on disclosure), in this case I would think that a reference to the narrator’s subject position and chosen identity would be helpful in situating these accounts within a complex political history of intersecting difference.
Attending to such concerns would, I feel, assist the producers of 60+: Queer, Old Joburg in their formulating of a reflective and suitably layered queer digital archive, and one in which ‘cruising’ is deployed as a poetic archival approach – open to the kind of relationality that, as Glissant puts it, “makes every periphery into a centre”.
Reference:
Glissant, E. 2010. Poetics of Relation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p29
Peer Review
Project and Digital interface:
An extremely important work but it is not yielding its appropriateness, feels incomplete and in a draft form, perhaps. I don’t like the cock in the pants in the corner, it feels offensive and I don’t like how there is no key to the index and forms that might present themselves first as images, the front page of images and location and dates et al in the one document is not intersectional.
Some of the locations do not feel complete, eg: ‘Near the drill hall?’ as a marker is not good enough it for what felt demanded by the subject.
What are we looking at?
So I am aware that what we are looking is queer history, quite aware, but the political presentation of point of the queerness is not clear, is it to sanction a particular nostalgia?
Usability of the interface and the user’s experience of the project:
This holds enormous potential and challenges heritage and culture and archive sensibilities. The queer archive as a South African (spelling intentional) legacy seems to be currently at a point of fracture because there is no clear consensus on whiteness, and therefore of course on race, if these two points as particular and political are made as brave exchanges, a demographic perhaps something that links the fractures.
Summary:
The potential interface suggests interlinks and the like but this is not apparent enough.
The work is however, conceptually strong and very interesting. There is undoubtedly value academically to the emerging and exploratory field of creative research and this project has an excellent interdisciplinary approach and needs to be up front about its frame. I feel rearing back to its critical failings could also be reflexive, cartographic, and it definitely has strong links to the queering and gendering of the interdisciplinary intersections of: urban-history-performance-archive. It is an excellent project that just needs a stronger profile and self critical framing, be brave.